sven/FCES-native
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

chore: update telemetry log [skip ci]

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
AI-anonymous
2026-05-20 04:59:10 +02:00
parent 722f91425b
commit a1c123e590
1 changed files with 21 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

21
telemetry.log
View File

@@ -984,3 +984,24 @@
[INFO] fitness_calculated | loss=9.001093 ema_loss=9.001398 fitness=0.273899
[INFO] fitness_calculated | loss=9.001094 ema_loss=9.001383 fitness=0.273834
[INFO] fitness_calculated | loss=9.001093 ema_loss=9.001368 fitness=0.273781
[INFO] optimizer_initialized | version=0.1.0 pop_size=8
[INFO] fitness_calculated | loss=6.717806 ema_loss=7.024876 fitness=0.148992
[WARN] divergence_detected | loss=14.431556 ema=7.024876
[WARN] hard_reset_executed | rollback_sanitization
[INFO] fitness_calculated | loss=5.816512 ema_loss=7.000844 fitness=0.144255
[INFO] app_start | GenDiffLM SIMBA-FIRT inference loop initialized.
[INFO] inference_phase_start | Running legal case-solving pipeline.
[INFO] case_1_t0_draft | Minderung nach § 536 Abs. 1 BGB ist kraft Gesetzes eingetreten. Der Schimmel stellt einen Sachmangel dar. M schuldet daher nur die geminderte Miete.
[WARN] case_1_t1_bottleneck | Collision detected: Draft ignored § 536b BGB.
[WARN] case_1_t1_bottleneck | Logic Gap: M hatte bei Vertragsschluss positive Kenntnis vom Schimmel und hat keinen Vorbehalt erklärt.
[INFO] case_1_t2_refined | Refined legal opinion generated.
[INFO] case_2_t0_draft | F hat einen Anspruch auf Aufwendungsersatz aus § 536a Abs. 2 BGB, da der Mangel umgehend behoben werden musste und V nicht erreichbar war.
[WARN] case_2_t1_bottleneck | Collision detected: Draft needs to justify why no prior setting of a deadline (Fristsetzung) was required.
[WARN] case_2_t1_bottleneck | Logic Gap: Anwendbarkeit von § 536a Abs. 2 Nr. 2 BGB (umgehende Beseitigung erforderlich zur Erhaltung/Wiederherstellung).
[INFO] case_2_t2_refined | Refined legal opinion generated.
[INFO] case_3_t0_draft | V hat einen Schadensersatzanspruch gegen M wegen Verletzung der Pflicht zur Mängelanzeige aus § 536c Abs. 2 Satz 1 BGB.
[WARN] case_3_t1_bottleneck | Collision detected: Ensure clear verification of causal connection (Kausalität) between missing notice and the final damage.
[WARN] case_3_t1_bottleneck | Logic Gap: Mitverschulden oder Haftungsausschluss prüfen.
[INFO] case_3_t2_refined | Refined legal opinion generated.
[INFO] inference_phase_complete | All cases processed successfully.
[INFO] app_finish | Exiting inference engine.